I agree with the speaker that teachers do
not diagnose, but collect data and translate it into educational needs. According to the speaker, a diagnosis
is a medical term used by licensed medical practitioners. The term educational diagnosis is a
made up term used to determine eligibility. Educators address the needs of students and how the
disability impacts the ability to access the curriculum. The most important things that
educators can do, is collect data.
For an educational plan to be successful it needs to have goals that are
observational and measurable. In
order to see if the child is making progress on those goals, data needs to be
taken. Data cannot be taken in
just one environment and in one situation. Educators need to take data on the child’s ability to
generalize across many environments.
This is a benefit that educators have over medical practitioners, the
ability to get data across many situations.
I also agree with the speakers comment
that the most important part of the assessment is the person conducting the
assessment. When assessing if a
child may have autistic like characteristics an assessor would look at many
things but in particular the child’s social, communication, and restrictive/repetitive
behaviors. In education you do not
need a clinical or medical diagnosis to get special education services. In addition, just because a child may
have the diagnosis of autism it does not mean sped automatically. A child may need a 504 for
accommodations. Only when child is
not progressing in the curriculum that educational needs need to be
addressed. If the person
conducting the assessment isn’t aware of the different options for children
with autism they may not be helping.
In addition, the speaker said it nicely by saying that the assessments
may not be the best for a child with autism. Standardized assessments may be limited in terms of the
validity and reliability.
Standardized tests may provide objective data about broad functioning,
may be able to only give a portion of the standardized test and it is important
to cross reference results with observations and interview data to make
relevant and point out discrepancies.
Reliability can be an issue due to highly variable performance of skills
or it may over or underestimate abilities.
The most important piece that I took from
this video is the importance of multiple sources of assessment including both
formal and informal assessment.
The key aspect I remember is when the speaker mentioned a team,
triangulated approach to assessment.
What that means is that multiple raters, across multiple environments
are used to cross reference data and findings. The example of the green jellybean was key to this
concept. If the speech therapist
had not said that perhaps it was the wrong green jellybean, the whole testing
session would have been over with.
However, with the team approach and using everyone’s knowledge of the
whole child the correct jellybean was given and testing resumed
successfully.
Assessing any child can be a
challenge. Assessing children with
autistic like characteristics can have other challenges. It is important to use multiple means
of assessment and it is very important to be knowledgeable of the characteristics
and the assessments for the specific child. I agree with the speaker that teachers do not diagnose, but
collect data and translate it into educational needs, and the most important
part of the assessment is the person conducting the assessment
No comments:
Post a Comment